Search Form
First, enter a politician or zip code
Now, choose a category

Special Interest Groups

Rating Group: The Center for Education Reform

2016 Positions

State Office District Name Party Rating
AR Governor Asa Hutchinson Republican 83%
AZ Governor Doug Ducey Republican 100%
DC Mayor At-Large Muriel Bowser Democratic 100%
DE Governor John Carney, Jr. Democratic 17%
FL U.S. Senate Jr Rick Scott Republican 100%
HI Governor David Ige Democratic 50%
IN Governor Eric Holcomb Republican 100%
KY Governor Matt Bevin Republican 100%
LA Governor John Bel Edwards Democratic 0%
MA Governor Charlie Baker Republican 83%
MD Governor Larry Hogan, Jr. Republican 58%
MS Governor Phil Bryant Republican 75%
MT Governor Steve Bullock Democratic 0%
NC Governor Roy Cooper III Democratic 0%
ND Governor Doug Burgum Republican 33%
NE Governor Pete Ricketts Republican 50%
NH Governor Chris Sununu Republican 75%
NY Governor Andrew Cuomo Democratic 67%
OR Governor Kate Brown Democratic 17%
PA Governor Tom Wolf Democratic 0%
RI Governor Gina Raimondo Democratic 8%
TX Governor Gregory Abbott Republican 75%
UT Governor Gary Herbert Republican 100%
VT Governor Phil Scott Republican 50%
WA Governor Jay Inslee Democratic 0%
WV Governor Jim Justice, Jr. Republican 0%
Robert Bentley 50%
Terry Branstad 67%
Jerry Brown 25%
Sam Brownback 75%
Chris Christie 67%
Dennis Daugaard 67%
Mark Dayton 17%
Nathan Deal 92%
Mary Fallin 92%
Eric Greitens 50%
Nikki Haley 92%
Bill Haslam 83%
John Hickenlooper 67%
John Kasich 83%
Paul LePage 92%
Dan Malloy 50%
Susana Martinez 92%
Terry McAuliffe 17%
Matt Mead 50%
Butch Otter 100%
Bruce Rauner 100%
Brian Sandoval 92%
Rick Snyder 67%
Bill Walker 25%
Scott Walker 100%

How to Interpret these Evaluations

Keep in mind that ratings done by special interest groups often do not represent a non-partisan stance. In addition, some groups select votes that tend to favor members of one political party over another, rather than choosing votes based solely on issues concerns. Nevertheless, they can be invaluable in showing where an incumbent has stood on a series of votes in the past one or two years, especially when ratings by groups on all sides of an issue are compared. Website links, if available, and descriptions of the organizations offering performance evaluations are accessible by clicking on the name of the group.

Most performance evaluations are displayed in a percentage format. However, some organizations present their ratings in the form of a letter grade or endorsement based on voting records, interviews, survey results and/or sources of campaign funding. For consistency and ease in understanding, Project Vote Smart converts all scores into a percentage when possible. Please visit the group's website or call 1-888-VOTESMART for more specific information.

Skip to top

Help us stay free for all your Fellow Americans

Just $5 from everyone reading this would do it.

Thank You!

You are about to be redirected to a secure checkout page.

Please note:

The total order amount will read $0.01. This is a card processor fee. Please know that a recurring donation of the amount and frequency that you selected will be processed and initiated tomorrow. You may see a one-time charge of $0.01 on your statement.

Continue to secure page »

Back to top